.jpg)
The Three Website Structures That Work Best for Real Estate Managers And When to Use Each

How thesis-forward, portfolio-forward, and platform-forward architectures shape investor comprehension
A real estate manager’s website is often the first extended interaction an allocator, advisor, or prospective partner has with the platform. It is also one of the few brand touchpoints that must serve multiple audiences simultaneously: investment professionals, intermediaries, potential recruits, and sometimes retail investors, depending on the product set.
Across the industry, three website structures appear consistently because they help users understand who the manager is, what they do, and how to navigate the information. While each structure has strengths, their effectiveness depends heavily on strategy breadth, product complexity, and the firm’s communication priorities.
At DG, we see the three core architectures, not because firms are imitating one another, but because these formats tend to improve clarity and user experience.
1. Thesis-Forward Design
Best for managers with a clear investment philosophy or a distinctive point of view
A thesis-forward website places the firm’s worldview at the center of the experience. Visitors encounter a clearly articulated approach to the market, often supported by cycle-aware reasoning, targeted sector perspectives, or a defined sourcing framework.

This structure is most effective for:
- Sector-specialist managers
- Emerging managers seeking early differentiation
- Strategies that rely on a proprietary lens or operating insight
- Firms where narrative clarity is core to the value proposition
- Managers with diverse strategies that can be difficult to relate to one another
Why it works
A thesis-forward site gives users immediate orientation: what the manager believes about the market and why their approach makes sense right now. For allocators who evaluate strategies through the lens of fit and coherence, this format helps establish context before details.
What to watch for
Because the thesis sits front-and-center, it must be well-structured and measured, avoiding overly declarative market statements. Retail-facing managers, in particular, benefit from balancing thought leadership with plain-language explanation.
2. Portfolio-Forward Design
Best for managers whose track record, asset examples, or execution capabilities are the primary differentiators
Portfolio-forward websites surface real projects early, not to showcase volume, but to contextualize how the strategy works in practice. The “portfolio” becomes the interpretive tool that helps visitors understand markets, risk posture, and operating capabilities.

This structure is most effective for:
- Vertically integrated or operator-oriented platforms
- Firms with meaningful asset diversity
- Strategies where real-world examples clarify the thesis more than narrative alone
Why it works
For some strategies, especially value-creation or development-heavy approaches, seeing selected projects helps users grasp scale, geography, and execution style more clearly than text descriptions.
The strongest implementations avoid presenting large photo galleries; instead, they combine:
- high-level asset cards,
- abbreviated business plans,
- standardized metrics (e.g., square footage, use type, region), and
- links to deeper strategy pages.
What to watch for
Portfolio-forward design requires disciplined curation. Too many projects, inconsistent photography, or large variances in detail can create noise. Retail-facing programs also need to ensure disclosures accompany any performance references appropriately, often influencing layout.
3. Platform-Forward Design
Best for multi-strategy managers or firms with complex distribution channels
Platform-forward websites organize the experience around the structure of the firm itself: its teams, product vehicles, capabilities, and operating subsidiaries or affiliates. This format acts as a directory, helping users understand where they should navigate based on their needs.

This structure is most effective for:
- Managers with institutional and wealth-channel products
- Firms offering multiple strategies (core, income, development, opportunistic, sector vehicles)
- Large organizations where team, scale, or infrastructure is a primary signal of readiness
Why it works
Platform-forward sites help visitors self-select: institutional LPs may head toward strategy pages, advisors may navigate toward product microsites, and prospective talent may go to careers or culture pages. This format supports clear segmentation without complexity.
Public examples, including large diversified real estate firms, often use this model because it scales well across product types and allows microsites to sit cleanly alongside parent-brand pages.
What to watch for
Platform-forward structures depend heavily on navigation clarity. Without intuitive menus, users may feel uncertain about where to begin. For wealth-channel products, creating a clear “Advisor Resources” path or standalone microsites avoids crowding the institutional narrative.
How to Choose the Right Structure
Align the website architecture to strategy complexity, audience mix, and communication goals
Choosing among these three models is less about preference and more about determining which architecture helps an audience understand the firm with the least friction.
Use Thesis-Forward when:
- The differentiator is how you think, not how many strategies you offer
- You are an emerging manager or a sector specialist
- Your thesis provides meaningful context for interpreting performance or portfolio decisions
Use Portfolio-Forward when:
- Real examples illustrate the strategy better than abstract explanation
- You want to highlight vertical integration or operating capability
- The assets themselves help clarify scale, market focus, or execution style
Use Platform-Forward when:
- You need to serve multiple audiences with different needs
- Your offerings span institutional LPs, advisors, and/or retail investors
- Complex products require separate microsites or tailored disclosure frameworks
For many firms, hybrid models work well. For example, a thesis-forward homepage paired with a platform-forward navigation bar, or a platform-forward main site supplemented by product-specific microsites.
What matters most is that the structure supports, rather than complicates, the story. An allocator, advisor, or investor should understand where to go and what matters within moments.
Closing Thought
A real estate manager’s website is a structural expression of the brand. The right architecture helps users grasp the strategy’s intent, the platform’s capabilities, and the path to deeper engagement. The wrong one adds friction before the strategy is ever considered.
By choosing a design model aligned with strategy complexity and communication priorities, managers create a clearer narrative environment where their strengths can be understood quickly and responsibly.



